Select Page

Mechanical organ making

The Radcliffe Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Mechanical organ making

 

The making and restoring of mechanical organs. See also organ making.

 

Status Endangered
Historic area of significance England, Holland, Belgium, US, Cuba, France
Area currently practised Canterbury, Kent, Yorkshire, Buckinghamshire, Whitchurch, Bristol
Origin in the UK 1700s
Current no. of professionals (main income) Approximately 6
Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
Approximately 6
Current no. of trainees 0
Current total no. serious amateur makers
3
Current total no. of leisure makers
6-20

 

History

The mechanical organ is a variation of the church organ, but the two technologies developed very differently. Barrel organs were the first type to be developed but were eventually superseded by the pneumatic punched card and paper roll systems in the late 1800s.

In newer systems electronic and computer systems have been used on both new and old instruments whilst retaining the pipe organ element.

Mechanical organs are associated with dance halls, fairgrounds, cafes, pubs, stately homes, old cinema, street entertainment, public shows and churches (church barrel organs).

 

Techniques

  • Woodwork
  • Metalwork
  • Leatherwork
  • Carving
  • Painting
  • Instrument making e.g. acoustics, musical knowledge, tuning, fluid dynamics
  • Engineering

 

Local forms

Mechanical organs vary depending on country of origin and application e.g. different materials may be used according to local availability and climate considerations.

 

Sub-crafts

Related crafts:

  • Reed organs
  • Pianola
  • Music boxes etc.
  • Manufacture of folding cardboard music books, paper roll and barrel manufacture.

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Training and recruitment: There are no qualifications, and funding and time to train are a problem.
  • Lack of skills: There is a lack of passed down skills in conservation and restoration. The work is time consuming and requires knowledge and skills in multiple parts and components.
  • Market issues: There is still a demand despite the decline in traditional use at fun fairs etc.
  • Market issues: Financial and legislative changes in recent times have led to a decline in usage and wider ownership.  For example, large instruments require transportation, licencing, vehicle, taxation etc. There is also an issue with the high costs of storage for private owners.
  • Supply of raw materials: Some materials are difficult to source such as metal parts that have to be engineered or types of wood used.
  • Small business issues: Typically the restorer/builder has to deal with all the administration as well as the technical work. The work is time consuming with a slow turnover.
  • Legislative issues: Some materials are now difficult to source and some health and safety restrictions can make things difficult.
  • Global and geopolitical issues: Brexit has had an impact on the flow of materials and parts as many come from Europe.
  • Poor repairs due to lack of skills: Many instruments have been poorly repaired to the point that they become unsalvageable. Instruments also need regular upkeep and servicing that can be expensive.

 

Support organisations

  • Mechanical Organ Owners Society
  • Mechanical Music Radio
  • Great Dorset Steam Fair

 

Craftspeople currently known

  • David Burville, Burville Organs
  • Richard Dean, Dean Organ Builders
  • Andrew Pilmer, AC Pilmer Automatic Music Ltd.
  • Allan Guest
  • Kevin Meayers, Meayers Organs
  • Rob Barker, Rob Barker Organs
  • Stuart Dobbs Organ Builder

 

Training providers

There are no specific training courses or apprenticeships for mechanical organ making.

 

Other information

 

 

References

  • Q. David Bowers, Encyclopedia of automatic musical instruments, 1997
  • Laurence Elvin, The Harrison Story: Harrison and Harrison, Organ Builders, Durham, 1973
  • Laurence Elvin, Organ Blowing: Its history and development, 1971
  • Rollin Smith, The Aeolian Pipe Organ and Its Music, 2018
  • Robert F Gellerman, The American Reed Organ and Harmonium: A Treatise on Its History, Restoration and Tuning, with Descriptions of Some
  • Outstanding Collections, Including a Stop Dictionary and a Directory of Reed Organs, 1996
  • Anthony Burton and Rob Scott, Britain’s Living Past, Bloomsbury Publishing Plc, 2019

Marionette making

The Radcliffe Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Marionette making

 

The making of traditional wood and string marionette puppets.

 

Status Endangered
Historic area of significance
  • China – possibly from as far back as 200BC.
  • India – Mahabharata mentions puppetry probably marionettes (dated from the 9th century BCE, it reached the written form in the 4th century BCE). Tamil texts from the 2nd century BCE onwards mention dolls moved by strings.
  • Sicily – from the 13th Century
  • France – 1800s, Lyon, their most famous puppet Guignol
  • Salzburg Marionette Theatre, Austria – founded in 1913
  • Prague, Czech Republic – 18th Century?
  • USA, early to mid 20th Century
  • Germany
Area currently practised London, Wales, Norwich
Origin in the UK There is evidence of puppetry taking place in the UK from the 1400s.
Current no. of professionals (main income) 1-5
Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
6-10

*50 members of PuppeteerUK describe themselves as having skills in Marionettes, but it is likely that these are mainly operators not makers

Current no. of trainees 11-20
Current total no. serious amateur makers
11-20
Current total no. of leisure makers
50-100 (estimate)

 

History

There is evidence of puppetry originally taking place in the UK around 600 years ago in the 1400s. The earliest recorded puppet show took place at Bartholomew Fair around 1600. In the 1700s, there are records of Italians travelling in the UK and performing with puppets, mostly likely marionettes (string puppets).

The 19th and early 20th century saw a renaissance of marionettes led by W.H. Whanslaw and Waldo Lancaster.

More recently the tradition was continued with John Wright Marionettes (1952 in South Africa, then in Hampstead London by 1957) who then founded the Little Angel Theatre by the late John Wright and his wife Lyndie in 1961. Marionette making is still vibrant in Europe, particularly Germany.

There are five remaining theatres in the UK with specially designed marionette bridges:

  • The Harlequin (Britain’s First Permanent Puppet Theatre) – Colwyn Bay, N. Wales. Opened 1958.
  • The Puppet Theatre Barge, London – is one of the only remaining theatres dedicated primarily to string puppets / marionettes.
  • The Norwich Puppet Theatre, Norfolk
  • The Little Angel Theatre, London
  • Upfront Theatre, Penrith
  • Purves Puppets

Most string puppet makers are associated with puppet theatres.

 

Techniques

  • Drafting and designing
  • Wood carving
  • Joint making
  • Treating and finishing
  • Marionette control design
  • Stringing

 

Local forms

 

 

Sub-crafts

  • Ornamental wood carving
  • Puppet making

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Training and recruitment issues: Lack of professional training opportunities; lack of opportunities to practice as there is a limited number of productions; few remaining teachers / practitioners.
  • Demand issues: Marionette shows largely require 3-6 performers as a minimum and require specific staging. Many producers and theatres will only be able to programme 2-person shows due to lack of funding / rising overheads. So the skills in making marionettes are not as in demand as in the past.
  • Market issues: Lack of demand to programme marionette shows in favour of more contemporary forms of puppetry
  • Small business issues: These reflect the general challenges to funding within the arts sector
  • Ageing workforce: The remaining experts / teachers are all ageing and/or semi-retired.
  • Global and geopolitical issues: Challenges to UK artists to travel with shows due to Brexit and having to transport specialist equipment.

 

Support organisations

  • Puppeteers UK
  • British Unima (UNION INTERNATIONALE DE LA MARIONETTE)
  • The British Puppet and Model Theatre Guild
  • Puppet Centre
  • Curious School of Puppetry
  • Little Angel Theatre

 

Craftspeople currently known

  • Lyndie Wright – Little Angel Theatre (designer and puppet maker, marionettes as a key craft)
  • John Roberts – Puppet Craft UK (director and puppet maker, marionettes as a key craft)
  • Stephen Mottram
  • Stan Middleton – Puppet Barge
  • Chris Sommerville (The Harlequin) (maybe only performing)
  • Oliver Hymans – Little Angel Theatre
  • Sarah Wright – Curious School of Puppetry  (performer and puppet maker including marionettes)
  • Jan Zalud (automata maker and puppet carver including marionettes)
  • Peter O’Rourke (designer and puppet maker including marionettes)
  • Andrew Grundon
  • Sarah Vigars
  • Nik Palmer – Noisy Oyster
  • Tony Sinnett

 

Training providers

There are no formal training opportunities specifically in marionette making.

Short courses

The following offer short courses and other opportunities to learn marionette making skills:

  • Curious School of Puppetry – covers some marionette performance skills, however not making.
  • John Roberts – Puppet Craft UK – marionette carving courses
  • Little Angel Theatre
  • Puppets in Prague School – online courses in marionette making

Degrees and postgraduate study

Whilst there are no degrees that are specifically in marionette making, there are some that include an element of puppet making.

  • UAL: Wimbledon College of the Arts offer a postgraduate course MA Puppetry
  • Royal Central School of Speech and Drama are no longer offering a BA in Puppetry but an MA course is currently under development (2023).

 

Other information

There are various collections of historic marionettes in the UK:

  • British Museum collection
  • Horniman Museum collection
  • National Puppetry Archive
  • V&A puppet archive

 

References

  • Ysenda Maxtone Graham, writing for The Spectator, Dec 17 2022, The puppetry renaissance: But the most enchanting and emotionally engaging kind of puppet of all, the marionette, is still critically endangered
  • Carve a marionette by John Roberts
  • John McCormick, The Victorian Marionette Theatre, 2004
  • Max Von Boehn, A Photographic Guide to Marionettes in the Nineteenth Century, 2011
  • George Speaight, History of the English Puppet Theatre, 1990
  • Ken Barnard, Life and Travels of Richard Barnard – Marionette Proprietor, 1981

Hewing

The Radcliffe Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Hewing

 

Converting tree rounds into structural timbers using only hand tools.
.

 

Status Endangered
Historic area of significance Internationally but with regional variations. Used in the UK.
Area currently practised Varied.  No longer practised as a full time occupation.
Origin in the UK Since axes were created though the best work was during medieval period.
Current no. of professionals (main income) 1-5

Members of the Carpenters’ Fellowship were identified and asked to give details of any hewers known to them outside of the CF.

Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
21-50

Most of these will have done the odd job, so much less than half of their income.

Current no. of trainees 0
Current total no. serious amateur makers
0
Current total no. of leisure makers
51-100

At least 65 have attended Carpenters’ Fellowship events over last 3 years.

 

History

Hewing, as a method of conversion, was used extensively across the globe with regional variations. Methods, techniques and tools vary based on the timber species used and local craft styles employed. All craftsmen differ in their methods and techniques but essentially a hewer will mark out the required dimensions, notch out the timber and remove excess until the desired result is achieved.

Hewing was the predominant form of timber conversion in medieval England with its peak of skill level occurring in the mid-14th Century. This resulted in box-heart (hewn on four sides) being the most common type of conversion used between the 13th and 15th Centuries, with pit sawing not becoming common until the 15th Century opening the way for an increased level of halved timbers (timbers hewn on four sides and then sawn through middle). In the 16th  Century the practice extended to converting larger diameter trees by first hewing them square and then sawing into quarters or smaller fractions.

The use of hewn native timber in our vernacular buildings has provided a distinctive heavy structural style that works in harmony with our building materials.

In the UK, the move from hand tools to mechanised methods of conversion was caused by several factors; the decline in native oaks, the increase of softwood and the increased availability of saws and saw mills. The craft was lost although maintained in Europe, predominantly in the East.

In the 1990s a group of carpenters, now known as the Carpenters’ Fellowship, started a timber framing revival. Part of their extensive research was to do experimental archaeology using all known evidence on the subject, in particular drawing on evidence direct from timber surfaces and historical drawings of carpenters in action. Research examined timbers from buildings for evidence, with particular attention paid to the use of level marks, notches, and surface finishes to deduce the theory behind the  traditional methods used. The theories were tested using experimental archaeology and working with continental hewers.  Their endeavours form the basis of known hewing techniques in the UK today.

Since the 1990s there have been a few training courses and opportunities to pass on skills. The Weald and Downland Open Air Museum hosted a series of courses in the late 1990s and subsequently the Carpenters’ Fellowship have offered volunteer events providing hands-on training and experience (Cressing Temple 2008, Bucklers Hard 2014, Oxford 2019, Andover 2021).

 

Techniques

Hewing is the craft of converting tree trunks into structural members using traditional hand tools alone as part of the pre-framing process. Hewing allows for the maximum amount of timber to be used for structural members with the minimum waste. It is particularly useful for converting timbers with a natural camber and in awkward locations. It is the most environmentally effective method of conversion possible and aids in woodland management.

  • Setting up – the log is securely positioned prior to marking up.
  • Securing – dogs are bashed into the side of timber not being worked on. They are positioned at 45 degrees to ensure maximum stability.
  • Debarking – bark very often holds sand and debris that can cause unnecessary damage to axe blades.  However, there are many examples in historic buildings where debarking has not taken place.
  • Marking out – when felled, the timber end-grain surfaces are important for marking out plumbs, horizontals and the dimensions of the finished timber. The skill of the hewer will dictate the amount of marking required. It is possible to train the eye to reduce or even avoid any marking and save significant time, however this is reserved for exceptionally experienced hewers.
  • Cutting notches – this can be done with a scoring or double bevelled axe and creates a series of notches for more efficient removal of material.
  • Splitting – the removal of excess material along the length of the log between the cut notches with a scoring or double bevelled axe.
  • Finishing – creating the finished, squared off face using the broad or side or single bevelled axe.

 

Local forms

There are many regional variations and differences in technique depending on the species of timber.

 

Sub-crafts

Hewing is a sub-craft of timber framing.

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Training and recruitment issues – There are no qualifications in craft. CITB have structural timber qualifications but they do not include hand tool conversion as it’s not really recognised.
  • Market issues – The predominant reasons mitigating against the use of more hewn timber are the time required to complete the task and the labour cost compared with sawn timber. There are exceptions where hand hewing has proven efficient and pragmatic but generally the volumes required and the timescales for the projects mean that mechanical conversion is adopted. The skill is not widely known so there is not a market for it except in historical recreation work and demonstrations. It would be very beneficial if widely practiced in order to support local woodland and reduce dependency on French imported, converted timber.
  • Supply of raw materials, allied materials and tools – UK-made axes are difficult to source, but there are good quality Swedish and other European brands available.  Materials readily available.
  • Ageing workforce – Around 50% of names supplied are 50 or over. Due to nature of work a strong physique is required.
  • Legislative issues – It’s difficult to get insurance as there is a misconception that axes are more dangerous then power tools. Strength Grading. H&S tree felling, Woodland management.

 

Support organisations

  • Carpenters’ Fellowship
  • Weald and Downland Museum

 

Craftspeople currently known

N.B. Please note that none of the names here stipulate earning their sole income, or even a substantial part of their income, from hewing.

  • Adam Lynch
  • Alexander Harwood
  • Andy Hyde
  • David Wilson
  • Greg Cumbers
  • Henry Russell
  • Jack Kern
  • Joe Thompson
  • John Russell
  • Julian Bell
  • Joel Henry
  • Marc Cox
  • Mike Dennis
  • Rick Lewis
  • Steve Woodley
  • Tim Potts
  • Tom Gallon
  • Tom Trant
  • Victor Martz
  • Will Wall
  • Will (Goose wing)

 

Training providers

There are no formal training options for hewing alone but some craftspeople may offer short courses. The Carpenters’ Fellowship demonstrate hewing and other skills at events and share skills amongst members.

Post Graduate Study

The Weald and Downland Museum offers two Master’s Degree programmes in Building Conservation and Timber Building Conservation. As part of this course students will study the practical and theoretical aspects of hewing amongst other timber framing skills.

 

Other information

 

 

References

  • The Mortise and Tenon, Carpenters’ Fellowship Journal of Timber Frame Carpentry. Number 1-10, 1994-2000
  • Iain McCaid and Brian Ridout, English Heritage, Practical Building Conservation: Timber, 2012

Gauged brickwork

The Radcliffe Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Gauged brickwork

 

Setting out and executing ‘cut and rubbed’ and ‘gauged brickwork’ for decorative architectural features, arches, aprons, cornices, pilasters, pediments, and niches. This is achieved through post-fired shaping the special individual rubbing bricks to produce a high degree of regularity, accurate dimensions and, with gauged work, extreme fineness in the joints. Also see brick making.

 

Status Endangered
Historic area of significance Netherlands, Belgium, Northern France, Italy
Area currently practised England and, to a lesser extent, parts of Scotland and Wales
Origin in the UK Cut and rubbed work largely from the 15th Century – late Mediaeval Period – gauged work largely from the second half of the 17th Century
Current no. of professionals (main income) 21-50 full-time professionals working at a sufficiently advanced level

(Data supplied by Dr. Gerard Lynch)

Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
There will be heritage building professionals carrying out this work but numbers and levels of skills are unclear.
Current no. of trainees 11-20
Current total no. serious amateur makers
Current total no. of leisure makers

 

History

Brick as a popular building material dates back to the 13th and 14th Centuries but it was during the Tudor period that the craft of the brickmason became recognised as a skilled occupation and the choice of brick, instead of stone, for buildings of the wealthy merchants and aristocracy, saw brickwork become a prestigious building material. By the Tudor period the very best of English brickmasons, many of whom had moved across from stonemasonry, began to rival the Flemish craftsmen. This period is famed for its use of ornamental chimneys: a glorious riot of carved brick mouldings that were essentially an extension of the incredible craftsmanship of the previous century. The bricks for these, and other ‘cut and rubbed’ enrichments such as tracery, label courses, etc, were all skilfully shaped, post-fired, using the brick axe, and other masonry cutting and abrading tools, by craftsmen called ‘hewers’; who frequently worked within the cutting shed during the winter months, when fear of frost damage prevented any bricklaying. This period of ascendency saw the emergence of The Worshipful Company of Tylers and Bricklayers as one of the livery companies of the City of London. The organisation of Tylers (roof and floor tile layers) and Bricklayers had existed by 1416 but it was incorporated by a Royal Charter in 1568.

As the 17th and early 18th Centuries progressed, bricks became ever more popular and no longer just the preserve of the wealthy, and countless millions were made and laid. Architectural fashions moved from the highly decorative to the more refined as the effects and influence of the classical Renaissance spread across London after the Restoration (1660); when the influence of the Dutch use of brickwork came very much to the fore it led native bricklayers to follow their subtler utilisation of brick. The zenith of this was the skilful setting out and post-fired cutting of the low-fired bricks, or ‘rubbers’, with brick axes etc, for accurately laying within fine joints of lime putty: silver sand mortar, averaging 1mm 2mm, for a wide range of enrichments such as arches, aprons, pilasters, pediments, cornices and niches, etc; within the highest branch of the craft termed ‘Gauged Brickwork’.

The second half of the nineteenth century was largely characterised by revivalism in domestic architecture and industrial building, seeking a return to earlier types of building forms as a relief from what was viewed as the un-spirituality of an increasingly mechanised age.  At the highest end of the craft the Victorian desire for lavishly enriched ornamentation was tastefully crafted, with the return of the prolific use of beautifully executed gauged brickwork, which after the 1870s increasingly utilised over-sized, often fully-washed, rubbing bricks, cut to precise size and shape within profiled mould boxes using bow saws fitted with twisted wire blades.

(Dr Gerard Lynch, April 2023)

 

Techniques

Traditional constructed brickmasonry will include:

  • Knowledge of various types and classes of building limes, different types of aggregates, natural pozzolana and artificial pozzolans, natural pigments from ochres and vegetable sources
  • Hand preparation of mortars including the slaking of quicklime, various types and ratios of lime-based mortars and utilising and blending ochres to create pigmented pointing mortars
  • Knowledge of bricks, clay types, methods of brickmaking and rules of bonding brickwork and the wide variety of bonding patterns on solid-wall construction
  • Historic joint finishes, whether by jointing or pointing, e.g. the ability to accurately reproduce all forms of the many historic joint profiles with characteristic traditional neatness, including the most advanced called ‘Tuck Pointing’.
  • Setting out and executing both cut and rubbed work and gauged brickwork for decorative architectural features, including ornamental chimney stacks, all forms arches, aprons, cornices, pilasters, pediments, and niches.
  • The skilful preparation of special rubbing bricks to be shaped, post-fired, using hand tools such as the brick-axe for accurately replicating features executed in ‘cut and rubbed’ work, as seen from the 15th through to the early 17th centuries. Then to be also able to authentically recreate the more exacting skills of precisely preparing rubbing bricks, cut with the twisted wire blade within profiled moulding boxes, set with ‘fine-stuff’ mortar joints of 1mm in thickness, for architectural elements of Gauged Brickwork.

(Dr Gerard Lynch, April 2023)

 

Local forms

 

 

Sub-crafts

  • Brick gauging
  • Brick rubbing
  • Red-masonry (also covering brick sculpting – i.e. carving post-fired bricks)
  • Brick carving
  • Brick cutting

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Training and recruitment: The teaching the bricklayers receive doesn’t effectively address both the traditional and modern aspects of the craft. Those emerging out of NVQ Levels I, II and III Brickwork over the past 30 years are primarily trained in new build construction and the vast majority do not possess the required level of craft knowledge and high-level skills necessary to work on historic properties with empathy, competence and confidence. There is a pressing need for a well thought-out and carefully designed craft apprenticeship programme teaching the traditional aspects of the craft through education and training – covering its history, materials, related technology, calculations, building science, technical drawing, and geometry – alongside the elementary, advanced, and enhanced levels of practical skills required for applying them for quality conservation and restoration.
  • Small business issues: Firms cannot access sufficient financial support to fund the training of apprentices and up-skilling mature artisans.
  • Supply of raw materials: Raw materials, particularly handmade bricks, can be expensive due to the additional costs of specific clay preparation, making by hand drying and firing.
  • Ageing workforce: The majority of the skilled brickmasons with years of meaningful experience are now mostly in their 50s or 60s.
  • Legislative issues: Health and Safety is an unavoidable but significant cost.  Conservation work generally falls within the construction industry and therefore carries responsibilities under current health and safety legislation; these are outlined principally under the CDM (Construction Design Management) Regulations.

 

Support organisations

  • Worshipful Company of Tylers and Bricklayers
  • The Guild of Bricklayers
  • The British Brick Society
  • The Brick Development Association
  • Association of Brickwork Contractors
  • The National Trust
  • Historic England
  • Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings (SPAB)
  • West Dean College

 

Craftspeople currently known

See Building Conservation Directory

  • Dr Gerard Lynch, The Red Mason
  • Emma Simpson, Simpson Brickwork Conservation Ltd
  • John Gorman, Herts Renovation
  • Derren D’Archambaud, DGD Builders
  • Liam David Lynch – Redmason Heritage Masonry Services
  • Charles Reilly, Georgian Brickwork
  • Terrence Lee, Terrence Lee Conservation
  • Andrew Dunster
  • Ronnie Douglas, Douglas Brickwork
  • Lynn Mathias

 

Training providers

Short courses: A list of short courses can be found on the Building Conservation Directory website.

  • Dr. Gerard Lynch, The Red Mason, internationally acknowledged as the premier authority and master brickmason, provides bespoke education and high-level skills training for craftsmen and women alongside a wide range of organisations both in the UK and abroad.
  • Charles Reilley, Georgian Brickwork, offers training in partnership with Heritage Brickwork Training Ltd.
  • Terrence Lee Conservation runs training and short courses.
  • West Dean College offer courses in the conservation and repair of brick and flint masonry.

On-the-job training: Workplace NVQs at Levels 2 & 3 are available in Bricklaying and Heritage Skills.

 

Other information

 

 

References

  • Gauged Brickwork: A Technical Handbook, by Gerard Lynch, Gower (1990)
    Fully revised and re-published by Donhead Publishing (2006)
  • Bricklaying: Theory, Technology and Practice, Volumes 1 and 2, by Gerard Lynch, Donhead Publishing, (1994)
  • The History of Gauged Brickwork: Conservation, Repair and Modern Application, by Gerard Lynch, Butterworth-Heinemann, (2007)
  • Lime Mortars for Brickwork: Traditional Practice, Modern Misconceptions, The Building Conservation Directory, The Journal of Architectural Conservation (Part 1 March & Part 2 July 1998)
  • Gauged Brickwork – Tracing the Netherlandish Influence, Association for Studies in the Conservation of Historic Buildings, Transactions (2001)
  • The Characteristics and Properties of Rubbing Bricks used for Gauged Brickwork, The Journal of Architectural Conservation (Part 1 March & July 2003)
  • An Investigation of Hand Tools used for English Cut-and-Rubbed and Gauged Brickwork, The Second International Proceedings of Construction History (2005)
  • Putting Value Back into Craft Education and Training, The Journal of the American National Trust, (2005)
  • The Myth in the Mix, The Building Conservation Directory (2007)
  • Colour washing and Pencilling of Historic Brickwork, The Journal of Architectural Conservation, (July 2005)
  • Re-positioning Craft Education and Training to Re-connect Artisans to Designers, The Journal of The Association of Preservation Technology, USA, (2012)
  • Joint Finishes on Historic Brickwork, The Building Conservation Directory (2016)
  • Hot-mixed lime mortars and traditionally constructed brickwork, The Journal of the Building Limes Forum (2017)
  • Website – www.theredmason.co.uk
  • RW Brunskill, Brick Building In Britain
  • Victor Gollancz Ltd, London, 1990 Historic England
  • Practical Building Conservation Earth, Brick and Terracotta, Ashgate 2015
  • M Jenkins, Traditional Scottish Brickwork, Historic Environment Scotland, 2014
  • Nathaniel Lloyd, A History of English Brickwork, 1925, reprinted 2003.  See pages 75 + following on gauged work

Shetland lace knitting

The HCA Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Shetland lace knitting

 

The making of very fine hand-knitted lace using garter stitch. Shetland fine lace is an extremely delicate knitted fabric made with soft Shetland wool spun into very fine yarn and knitted into intricate patterns. It is traditionally knitted by hand on wires using a knitting belt.

 

Status Endangered
Group or community to which this craft is culturally important e.g. geographical, religious community, cultural identity, cultural practice, traditional industry or occupation Shetland Islands and Shetland diaspora communities.

Shetland lace is particularly associated with the Island of Unst.

Group or community where this craft is currently practised
Unst, Shetland and within diaspora communities.
Origin in the UK The Shetland Lace industry was at its height in the 19th Century.
Current no. of professionals (main income) 0
Current number of makers and/or people who hold the knowledge of this craft within the community 21-30 knitters working traditional Shetland Lace within the Shetland Islands
Current number of trainees and/or people who are learning the craft Not known, however there is a growing interest in lace in Shetland and a number of small groups and classes where people will learn.
Other makers
5000 +

Shetland lace knitting is only being passed on to a small extent within Shetland.

However, a version of it continues due to the general worldwide burgeoning popularity of knitting. Knitters are mostly looking to Ravelry and published patterns from popular authors to create and interpret decorative ‘lacy’ patterns, to include in their knitting

 

History

Shetland lace was the mainstay of the Shetland knitwear industry during the nineteenth century. Arthur Anderson, one of the founders of P&O Shipping Company, introduced Shetland shawls to Queen Victoria and from there it became fashionable for ladies to wear Shetland shawls and stockings. The knitters of Unst were renowned for their fine spun yarn and intricate lace items, a number of which can be seen at Unst Heritage Centre.

Lace knitting was not a full time occupation for many people and would have mostly been a secondary income for crofters and fishing families.

 

Techniques

Traditionally the unwashed wool from Shetland sheep (the finest being around the neck) was carded or combed and worsted spun for strength on a Shetland spinnie (small upright spinning wheel) into an extremely fine thread, which even though twined into two ply could produce a shawl fine enough to be pulled through a wedding ring.  In the twenty-first century a one ply commercial equivalent is available.

The complex every row patterns such as fern, cockle shell, eyelid, Madeira diamond, basket o’ flowers, puzzle and many others including distinct lace edges, are more suited to garter stitch items such as fine lace scarves, stoles and shawls, however can also be knitted into delicate tops.  Small and repeating alternate row lace patterns such as razor shell, old shell, horseshoe and print o’ the wave can also be knitted in stocking stitch for garments such as jumpers and cardigans, and then it is called openwork.

True Shetland lace is traditionally knitted on fine double pointed needles (wires) using a leather knitting belt. This would have allowed the craftspeople to knit faster and when they were walking around.

 

Local forms

There are many people knitting lace using the more contemporary techniques of circular needles, and referencing Shetland lace in their work. There are also other lace traditions in countries such as Estonia where very fine knitted lace is still made commercially.

However, the tradition of knitting on wires as it would have been traditionally done in Shetland, is becoming increasingly rare.

 

Sub-crafts

  • Spinning lace yarn

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • It is very difficult to make a viable income from knitting Shetland lace due to the huge amount of time and labour that goes into knitting each piece.
  • Shetland lace has become less popular as a garment although the people who own them do often consider them to be highly prized possessions and the pinnacle of a knitter’s skill.
  • The traditional methods of knitting on wires has been largely replaced with modern techniques such as using circular needles
  • Shetland cobweb lace yarn is only available from a limited number of suppliers

 

Support organisations

 

Craftspeople currently known

Individual craftspeople:

 

Training providers

  • Peerie Makkers – these groups are offered as an optional, usually lunchtime knitting tuition group, taught by volunteers in Primary Schools. These are usually led by experienced Shetland knitters, sometimes fine lace knitters. For example, Kathleen Anderson is the leader for Peerie Makkers at Skeld Primary School on the Westside. It is only able to offer basic level skills because of the time available, half an hour a week in term time in Skeld and the age of the children. However, the children progress from no knowledge of knitting, through garter stitch to basic lace stitches and or Fair Isle. Knitting belts are used or offered and Fair Isle is taught using a total of three needles, which is the usual way in Shetland.
  • Elizabeth Williamson – provides short courses

 

Other information

There are a high number of amateur makers all over the world who are lace knitting enthusiasts and they are often working at a highly skilled level. One facebook group has over 6,000 members. However, there are very few people who knit commercially or professionally.

There are some knitters in Shetland that may take commissions but most will knit shawls as family heirlooms and as gifts.

 

References

 

Wooden fishing net making

The HCA Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Wooden fishing net making

 

The construction of bentwood steamed ash or oak fishing nets and poles. See also net making.

 

Status Critically endangered
Historic area of significance UK
Area currently practised UK
Origin in the UK 1600s
Current no. of professionals (main income) 1
Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
0
Current no. of trainees 0
Current total no. serious amateur makers
1-5
Current total no. of leisure makers
1-5

 

History

Up until early 1900’s most nets were steamed ash. These were replaced by metalwork and, as modern materials came available, the wooden frames almost vanished entirely. Now landing nets are made from carbon fibre, alloy etc.

There are some in the traditional angling community who try to keep traditionally made wood or bamboo rods, nets and other fishing equipment from being lost. Steamed wooden frames are almost impossible to source without extensive research to find a craftsperson who knows how to make one.

 

Techniques

  • Wood selection
  • Hand crafting the wood into suitable sizes and shapes for steaming
  • Fitting the steamed wood onto a former to retain its oval shape. Once dried and set to shape, sand and polish using oils or varnishes
  • Fitting said wooden frame to already handmade brass or alloy fittings
  • Fitting the net to the frame

 

Local forms

Several variations of these nets are made. The nets for coarse anglers are usually pear shaped, and quite large. Game anglers prefer smaller frames sometimes with a more pronounced flat end, and integral wooden handle. Coarse anglers have threaded metal fittings for attaching long pole and is made by the same craftsmen who make the nets.

 

Sub-crafts

  • Construction of knotless mesh nets (as is required today by U.K Environment Agency regulations) which is now usually done in the far-east and mass produced. Handmade knotless mesh netting is virtually unobtainable except from far eastern imports.

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Market issues: the market for nets does exist and people are prepared to pay high prices, but the process of making them is complicated and relies on external suppliers
  • Availability of raw materials and components: makers have reported difficulties in sourcing nets, brass components and a good source of bamboo

 

Support organisations

 

Craftspeople currently known

Individual craftspeople:

 

Other information

 

 

References