Select Page

Coppice working

Currently viable crafts

 

Coppice working

 

The management of woodland such that young tree stems are repeatedly cut down to near ground level to produce long straight shoots for harvesting, and the making of products using these shoots. Many of the coppice crafts have separate entries.

 

Status Currently viable
Craft category Wood
Historic area of significance South East; South West; Cumbria (see ‘Other information’ for further details)
Area currently practised UK (see ‘Other information’ for further details)
Origin in the UK Paleolithic
Current no. of professionals (main income) 201-500 (coppice workers who make a proportion or all of their income from working coppice woodlands)
Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income)
Proportion of the above
Current no. of trainees 11-20
Current total no. serious amateur makers
Current total no. of leisure makers
Minimum no. of craftspeople required 501-1000

 

History

‘Coppice crafts’ is a broad term to describe the making of a wide variety of products including: pea sticks, hurdles, barrel hoops, clothes pegs, tent pegs, rakes, handles, spars, scythe snaiths, furniture and charcoal. Historically some craftsmen would have specialised in particular products, while others would have made a range of products. Today, coppice workers and woodsmen tend to make a range of items.

 

Techniques

 

Local forms

  • Oak coppice: Cumbria, Argyll, West Midlands for tan bark
  • Hornbeam coppice: Essex etc
  • Mixed coppice (birch, alder, willow, hazel, ash) for bobbin works: Cumbria
  • Ash coppice
  • Hazel coppice
  • Sweet chestnut coppice

 

Sub-crafts

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Cheap imports of coppice crafts.
  • A shortage of in-rotation coppice – and there are high costs involved in restoring coppice.

 

Support organisations

Craftspeople currently known

 

Other information

Historic area of significance: The heartlands are now Kent where the chestnut industry is still viable, Southern counties such as Sussex, Surrey, Hampshire, Dorset where the hazel industry was associated with historic sheep industry. However most counties have some connection with a coppice history Cumbria being another that has a remnant industry today.

Current area: The National Coppice Federation has coppice groups affiliated from most areas of England and some in Wales. There are fewer in Scotland but there is some coppice.

Several organisations run coppiceworking apprenticeships, such as the Bill Hogarth Memorial Trust and the Small Woods Association.

 

References

  • Jenkins, J Geraint, (1978) Traditional Country Craftsmen (Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd)
  • Tabor, Raymond, (1994) Traditional Woodland Crafts: A Practical Guide (B T Bastford Ltd)
  • Edlin, Herbert L, (1973) Woodland Crafts in Britain (David and Charles)
  • Oaks and Mills (2010) Coppicing and Coppice Crafts – a comprehensive guide .

Hurdle making

The Radcliffe Red List of Endangered Crafts

 

Hurdle making

 

The making of wattle hurdles and gate hurdles (moveable wooden panels used to section off a part of a field for sheep to graze).

 

Status Endangered (data under review)*
Historic area of significance South East and South West
Area currently practised Dorset
Origin in the UK Early Medieval
Current no. of professionals (main income) 21-50
Current no. of professionals (sideline to main income) 51-100
Current no. of trainees 11-20
Current total no. serious amateur makers
Current total no. of leisure makers

* Heritage Crafts are working with The National Coppice Federation to review this data

History

Wattle has a long history in Britain, with woven hazel or willow panels found in the Somerset Levels where it was laid down by Neolithic ancestors as track ways, used in Iron Age huts for walls, and wattle fencing was common by Middle Ages. From the Middle Ages onwards, wattle hurdles were mainly used as a portable fencing panel for penning sheep when grazing, being dipped, or being sheared, and offered protection from wind and rain at lambing time. They were intended to be lightweight so that several could be carried over the shoulder (Tabor 1994: 132). Wattle hurdles were primarily used in southern England where there was very little stone or timber growth for building folds and fences (Jenkins, 1978: 26).

By the mid-late twentieth century, wattle hurdles for sheep were replaced by lamping sheds and electric fences, but new markets have been found for them as garden screens and fencing panels, with 25,000 wattle screens sold every year in the 1990s (Tabor 1994: 132).

Gate hurdles are a form of open hurdle, made as a portable fencing panel primarily for penning sheep. Some were used for penning pigs and larger ones were even used to contain young bullocks at sales. Gate hurdles were intended to be lightweight so that several could be carried over the shoulder, but also robust enough to withstand rough treatment – they would be knocked into the ground with heavy blows and used repeatedly (Tabor, 1994: 122).

Unlike the wattle hurdle maker, the gate hurdle maker was historically a village worker rather than a woodland worker, transporting his raw material to the village workshop. Gate hurdle making was widespread in Hampshire and Berkshire, where it was needed to supply the demands of the sheep farmers on the downs there. Baghurst, Hampshire, was the best-known centre of the gate hurdle trade but by 1959, the last of the gate hurdle makers there was forced by economic circumstances to find alternative work (Jenkins, 1978).

 

Techniques

Wattle hurdles are made from hazel rods which are cut on a 5 to 7 year rotation. The following description is provided by Jenkins (1978: 27-28):

  • Shaping the zales: The zales and finishing rods are cut to length using a narrow-bladed spar hook. The end zales are left round and the rest are split centrally. The zales are sharpened to a straight point and placed in the mould.
  • Weaving the bottom: This is the most important part of the weaving. Two long thin rods are selected and inserted at right angles to one another in the gap between the first and second zales. Another pair is inserted in the next gap. These are known as ‘spur rods’ and are never cleaved. Taking each spur rod in turn, the craftsman twists and weaves them in between the zales to produce the bottom ten inches of the hurdle. When the bottom has been firmly laid, the rods are trimmed with a special type of knife.
  • Weaving the central part: The rest of the weaving is done using cleft hazel. Each piece is tucked into the woven bottom and woven between the zales. To make the ‘twilley hole’ two uncleft rods, similar to spur rods, are inserted in the weave and twisted round the end zales. Once the twilley is in place, the rest of the hurdle is woven.
  • Finishing off: Finally, two or three uncleft rods are taken and woven around the zales. The hurdle is trimmed and the loose ends removed, and then the hurdle is taken off the mould. The hurdles are stored flat on top of each other and left to season.

Gate hurdles (Jenkins, 1978: 81-83):

  • Shaping the heads: The poles are sorted according to length and thickness, and then two stout rods are cut and shaped to form the vertical heads. They are trimmed to length with a saw, put in a brake and cleaved in half with a froe, the bark stripped with a drawknife, and then pointed with a billhook (the pointed ends meant the shepherd didn’t need to dig preparatory holes when moving the hurdles). The morticing holes for the horizontal rails are then cut out using a morticing knife.
  • Shaping the rails: Longer, lighter poles are cleft with a froe and rinded with a draw knife, and the ends flattened with an axe. They are roughly hexagonal in cross section.
    Shaping the braces: The braces are shaped in the same way as the heads and rails.
  • Assembly: The various sections are placed in the right position on a special brake and the heads are trapped firmly on to the rails. The braces are placed in position fixed with nails. The nail heads are flattened so that they lie completely flat against the gate hurdle.
  • Finishing off: The hurdle is tidied up, stacked in batches weighed down with stones (to ensure each hurdle is flat), and left to season.

 

Local forms

The basic wattle hurdle is 6ft long by 3.5ft high, woven around ten ‘uprights’ or ‘zales/sails’ to give a tight weave. The last two zales at either end are longer so that adjacent hurdles can be overlapped and fixed to a post. A gap (’twilley hole’) is left in the weave between the centre two zales, through which the shepherd passes a stick in order to carry the hurdle on his back, and ten sharpened feet project at the bottom to grip soft ground. Sheep hurdles were constantly moved from place to place, so the ‘bottom binders’ were taken twice round each end zale to strengthen the hurdle. The method of picking up both bottom and top rods is the same for all types, but there are regional differences in the central weaving (Tabor 1994: 132-133).

However, garden hurdles vary from 3ft to 6ft high, and usually only have nine zales (the least you can have to make a tight weave) – and no twilley hole (Tabor 1994: 132-133).

Historically, gate hurdle patterns varied from county to county. Most varieties occur in the number of rails (also known as ‘slays’ or ‘ledges’) and the positioning of the braces.

  • East Anglia: 6ft long x 4ft high, with six rails
  • Kent: 8ft long x 4ft high with five rails
  • Hampshire: 6ft long x 3.5ft high, with 6 or 7 rails, one upright and two diagonal braces to give added strength

However, all gate hurdles had a smaller gap between the bottom three ledges than the remainder – so that lambs could fit their heads through to eat on the other side but older sheep could not (Tabor, 1994: 124).

The materials also varied from place to place, depending on what was locally available. The material was cut and sorted in winter, and the hurdles made in summer.

  • East Anglia: ash, but also hazel, elm and even oak
  • Kent: chestnut
  • Southern England: willow

 

Sub-crafts

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

  • Foreign competition: The importation of cheap mass-produced products from Eastern Europe means that prices are kept low.
  • Dilution of skills: Some ‘hurdles’ are machine-made and nailed together but are still marketed as ‘wattle hurdles’.
  • Business issues: Today’s regulations regarding Health and Safety, holiday pay, sick pay, paternity leave etc. and all the paperwork for an apprenticeship means that it is not feasible to employ a youngster for 2 or 3 years to learn all aspects of being a woodsman.
  • Recruitment issues: There are very few people who want to work outside in all weathers
  • Dilution of skills: Many of the groups offering weekend courses are taught by people who have only done weekend courses.
  • Dilution of skills: Many of the weekend courses do not teach the proper maintenance of copses which gradually leads the copses to become overstood in places and eventually destroys the whole copse.
  • Recruitment issues: Difficulty recruiting younger workers.
  • Recruitment issues: Although people are leaning hurdle making, almost none go on to be full time hurdle makers.
  • Market issues: The demand for gate hurdles has almost completely disappeared. Unlike wattle hurdles, it has not really been possible to find an alternative use for them. When Ray Tabor was writing in 1994, only about 1,000 gate hurdles were sold a year.

 

Support organisations

Craftspeople currently known

Please see the Coppice Products website for a list of hurdle makers. This data is currently under review.

 

Other information

 

References

  • Tabor, Raymond, (1994) Traditional Woodland Crafts: A Practical Guide (B T Bastford Ltd)
  • Jenkins, J Geraint (1978) Traditional Country Craftsmen (Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd)
  • Arnold, J, (1977) The Shell Book of Country Crafts (John Baker Publishers Ltd)
  • MERL, Rural Crafts Today: The Hurdle Maker

Hedgelaying

Currently viable crafts

 

Hedgelaying

 

The management of hedgerows by partially cutting through the stems, laying them over and weaving them together to produce a thick living barrier, which re-grows from the base.

 

Status Currently viable
Historic area of significance UK
Area currently practised UK, mainly in livestock areas
Origin in the UK Over 2,000 years

 

History

Most people will be familiar with the theory that hedge laying began thousands of years ago with the first farmers; from archaeological evidence we know that these ancient people were very skilled at using hazel and other materials to make hurdles and wattle fencing, there is of course no evidence remaining to illustrate their skills at hedge laying. The first positive record of hedge laying is found in the book by Thomas Tusser (1557-1580) where he makes a passing reference to hedge laying or ‘plashing’. The word comes from the French to cut, as in ‘pleaching’, but plashing is certainly not hedge laying as we know it, and simply indicates awareness that hedges needed to be managed. John Fitzherbert in 1573 gives a much more detailed description of cutting and laying.

Not until 1652 is there a real reference to hedge laying when Gervase Markham in his book records that there are different styles of ‘plashing’ in different parts of the country; this was simply a reflection of different people interpreting the practice in their own way to suit local circumstances. Thomas Hale’s book of husbandry in 1757 makes the first mention of using stakes in the hedge, where he urges the husbandman to survey the hedge before he starts work, picking out the straight stems to be used for the hedge and then cutting others to use as stakes where there is insufficient material to strengthen the hedge.

The Agricultural Revolution, which gathered momentum from the mid 18th century, saw many developments in agricultural practice and one of the ploughman’s responsibilities was to look after the hedges and ensure that they were stock proof, not so much to keep livestock in, but to prevent them encroaching on valuable food crops.

There is no indication of ‘style’ developing until the 19th century, when in the age of large estates, vying with each other to show off their wealth owners began to demand the best of their workmen; estates developed their own styles. It was not until the end of the 19th century that the styles we know were invented, growing not from regular agricultural work but from competitions. Judging at these competitions was a very subjective affair done by respected craftsman from the area. Their preferences for particular ways of laying were well known and so competitors adopted techniques to suit the judges, thus various styles developed which although related to agricultural practice in the area perhaps owed more to the judges at particular ploughing societies rather than to scientific study.

The advent of the First World War had a devastating effect on agriculture in general. Shortage of labour and demand for food meant that many of the niceties of managing the land were neglected. After the war a continuing shortage of labour and an economic downturn exacerbated the situation. The war had introduced an economical alternative to hedgerow management – barbed wire – invented in the USA in the 1880s and it soon became an economical alternative to good hedges. The Second World War lead to a further decline in hedgerow management and hedge laying on farms was now far less significant although the skills were being maintained by the many competitions which continued to flourish.

After the Second World War the demand for food created a major change in agricultural techniques, hedgerows were no longer considered of any value. Hedge laying was a costly and unnecessary process which could be replaced simply and cheaply by running barbed wire around a field, attaching it to any tree or shrub that was available. Tractor mounted flails were introduced which could trim a hedgerow to manageable proportions very easily.

Not until the late 1960s was there a general awareness of the damage that was being done to the countryside, and the alarm bells were sounding all over the country, with an increasing demand for tighter control of agriculture and the environment. It took another ten years before legislation was introduced to protect hedgerows and attention was once again drawn to hedgerow management techniques.

 

Techniques

 

Local forms

There are different styles of hedgelaying across parts of the UK. Each style has been developed over many years to cope with the climate of the area, different farming practices and the type of trees and shrubs that grow in the hedge.

Hedges consist of different species of trees and bushes including hawthorn, blackthorn, hazel, oak, sycamore, ash and field maple and others. So they need to be treated by different techniques which gives rise to the many varied styles across the country. There are more than thirty styles recorded in the UK plus others in France, Germany and Holland.

 

Sub-crafts

  • Cornish hedgelaying

 

Issues affecting the viability of the craft

 

Support organisations

 

Craftspeople currently known

The National Hedgelaying Society has a list of practitioners around the UK on its website.

 

Other information

At the moment there is a shortage of hedgelayers nationwide.

 

References

  • National Hedgelaying Society, A Brief History of Hedgelaying
  • National Hedgelaying Society, Regional Styles